Reviews, profiles and news about art in Chicago

Review: William Eckhardt Kohler/Linda Warren Gallery

Painting, West Loop Add comments


The problem with contemporary religious art is that it seems the result of conformity rather than discovery, so you get the feeling that nobody, including the artist, really believes it. Like a docile parishioner, it’s just following rules and dutifully going through the motions. But there are no rules in the contemporary art world, so when an artist like William Eckhardt Kohler (born 1962) fills a gallery with large, visionary paintings, it can actually feel like a spiritual experience. Kohler is obviously on some kind of a quest, and its goal is not especially to sell paintings. He explores the world, both inner and outer, rather than reacting with the irony, anger, humor, or disgust that is more common to successful contemporary Chicago artists. With titles like “In the Garden of the Blessed,” “Night Ceremony,” and “Up the Mountain,” his paintings lead us into high chroma landscapes that feel as much like Mughal miniatures as they do the American land or the free, swirling, calligraphic brushstrokes of Abstract Expression. And unlike his paintings from earlier years, this series from 2010 is more of a solitary journey, with only an occasional, loosely sketched human or animal figure. Are the hares and crows intended to guide the seeker through these fantastic hills of pink and blue trees? Is this the same kind of journey that the intoxicated Carlos Castaneda took with his brujo through the chaparral of northern Mexico? This may not be among the very best visionary art. Kohler is quite adept in navigating the ins and outs of pictorial space. But these paintings are just not beautifully sharp and ecstatic enough to convince this pilgrim that the Truth has been found, though I am convinced that he’s on the way, and would certainly like to see where he goes next. (Chris Miller)

Through February 26 at Linda Warren Gallery, 1052 West Fulton Market.

3 Responses to “Review: William Eckhardt Kohler/Linda Warren Gallery”

  1. sweens123 Says:

    Although certainly a painting contributes to an argument, looking to be “convinc[ed]” is not the way to approach a work of art. CMiller ought to come to a painting with a real (and not rhetorical) aporia–waiting for his experience. The shallow ground of Kohler’s paintings (the way that the bright colors do not allow the surface to recede back too far and creates ambiguous space) allows a viewer to bob in and out along the surface. This surface journey, I think, can be a pilgrimage in paint. How figures emerge but also become indistinguishable from the background can lead one to a vague peace when one realizes that his or her existence is not the center around which the world is composed. This also comes with an excitement that one can in fact compose the world.

  2. sweens123 Says:

    “[T]hese paintings are just not beautifully sharp and ecstatic enough to convince this pilgrim that the Truth has been found…”

    UNcertainty (rather than certainty in a Truth) also guides the pilgrim/painter/artist/meditative accountant. Sharpness and clarity of vision are only stereotypically prophetic. Prophets and visionaries too live in the ambiguity of human existence.

  3. mountshang Says:

    Thanks so much, Ms. Sweeney, for your astute comments.

    But maniac that I am, I want so much more than a “vague peace”.

    I want to be utterly convinced, even if it’s only for the instant that the entirety of a painting can be comprehended, and even if the “argument” can never be put into words.

    Lots of paintings do that for me, and they don’t have to be any more figurative than Kandinsky, but here’s
    some examples that feel like a sharpness and clarity of vision (at least to me) while also using some of the same figurative elements that Kohler does, as well as his “bright colors that do not allow the surface to recede back too far and creates ambiguous space” :

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.