Reviews, profiles and news about art in Chicago

Newcity’s Top 5 of Everything 2009: Art & Museums

News etc. 5 Comments »

Top 5 Museum Showsolafur_eliasson-one-way_colour_tunnel-2007
Olafur Eliasson, Museum of Contemporary Art
Your Pal, Cliff: Selections from the H.C. Westermann Study Collection, Smart Museum
Paul Chan, Renaissance Society
Mary Lou Zelazny, Hyde Park Art Center
James Castle: A Retrospective, Art Institute of Chicago
—Jason Foumberg

Top 5 Gallery Shows
Rob Carter, Ebersmoore Gallery
Big Youth, Corbett vs. Dempsey
Sarah Krepp, Roy Boyd Gallery
Everybody! Visual resistance in feminist health movements, 1969-2009, I Space
Ali Bailey, Golden Gallery
—Jason Foumberg Read the rest of this entry »

Review: EveryBody! Visual resistance in feminist health movements/I Space

Multimedia, Prints, River North No Comments »

eb_2RECOMMENDED

A father watches his daughters play in front of a large cloth vagina complete with Velcro-on organs. “Okay, that’s enough,” he says as one girl hits the other with a sparkly pink fallopian tube. This is one of the many interactive pieces in “Everybody!” and the secret to the show’s success. By inviting viewers to pose in front of an oversized vagina, examine plastic speculums and color in pictures of female genitalia, a potentially uncomfortable subject is demystified through education and interaction. Most of the imagery in the show treats the female anatomy, but the health issues presented do affect women, men and transgendered people. The issues, including reproductive rights and rape, are still as serious now as they were fifty years ago when the Women’s Health Movement (WHM) first started. However, a sense of urgency, created by the current national healthcare debate, is implicit in the show. The artwork ranges from 1960s WHM posters to contemporary painting, installation and performance pieces. Though historically minded, the exhibition doesn’t present a linear chronological narrative. Instead, one subject relates to another, and one response influences another understanding. Ideas are reworked and reinterpreted. Tank tops with red-spotted crotches and the text “I had an abortion” serve as modern Scarlet Letters, while an adult with a fetal-filled text bubble lectures to young girls holding caviar-like egg sacs, reminiscent of school-mandated health class. Just as in health class, the girls appear simultaneously amused, intrigued and disgusted by the information. (Patrice Connelly)

Through October 10 at I Space, 230 W. Superior, Suite 230

Review: Response: Art and the Art of Criticism/I Space

Multimedia, River North No Comments »

stupidthingdetailvertRECOMMENDED

For “Response: Art and the Art of Criticism,” nine art critics selected one artist each to exhibit and ruminate over. Unsurprisingly, this phalanx of wordsmiths produced as disjointed an exhibition as the multitudinous artistic practices that viably exist in today’s art world. Lacking another discernable undercurrent, this collection of art functioned primarily as a counterpoint to the conversations housed within the catalogue and podcasted on the I Space website. In a sense, then, I am faced with the difficult task of critiquing art criticism, the very form of which I am now typing and that you will soon have just read. At the very least, art writing is “a record of another person’s perception” that “makes a point of looking carefully” and then “presents clearly and succinctly what it is they have seen,” says artist Adelheid Mers in reference to her critic Fred Camper. But representing the experiential with a text is like “Saying the unsayable,” writes critic Polly Ulrich, quoting Rainer Marie Wilke, and continually attempting to create the means to communicate the intricacies of our existence without reducing that experience (in this case, art) to the “given name, the institutional name of something, whereby we feel like if we know that name [then] we know the thing,” writes critic Lori Waxman, in the midst of a cultural momentum that is pushing art criticism towards “something closer to talk, which is more exteriorized and socialized, addressed and about transmission,” writes critic Lane Relyea, than about the substance which frequently springs from such conversations. (Dan Gunn)

Through May 30 at I Space, 230 W. Superior.

Review: Barbara Kendrick and Sam Ainsley/I Space

Multimedia, River North No Comments »
22spprac-hotel-oracle

Barbara Kendrick, "Spatial Practice: Hotel Oracle," 2008

RECOMMENDED

“Atlas of Encounters” pairs Glasgow-based artist Sam Ainsley with Barbara Kendrick, both of whom have had distinguished university careers: Kendrick is professor emeritus at the School of Art and Design at UIUC, and until recently, Ainsley headed up the prestigious MFA program at the Glasgow School of Art. Each artist conceives of the human body as a vessel through which external knowledge flows. Ainsley’s large-scale paintings flirt with abstraction, but appear more visceral the longer they’re viewed. Often executed on velvety blue or purple grounds, their composition and framing has the flattened perspective of an x-ray or photogram. Heart muscles reach out to their blackened and dessicated doubles, skulls have glowing green frontal lobes lit up like cat-scan images. Kendrick also paints the body as something mysterious and hermetic. The candy-colored palette of her larger-scale watercolors provides a playful counterpoint to the gothic overtones of Ainsley’s works, but Kendrick’s pretty paintings harbor deep-seated anxieties as well. Many look delectable enough to eat; but come closer, and the hairy bits growing out of the embryonic, spud-like forms floating around repel the tongue. Uniformly rectangular, like wet-mounted slides, Kendrick’s series of smaller ink and watercolor collages combine images culled from fashion magazines, art and anatomy books in surreal landscapes that figure the body as disconnected parts that only momentarily coalesce when trapped under a lens. Kendrick and Ainsley ultimately reach similar conclusions: the body has been hyper-scrutinized—by medicine, science, fashion, art—and yet in many ways it’s still uncharted territory. (Claudine Isé)

Through March 14 at I Space, 230 W. Superior.

Eye Exam: Cracking the Type Cast

Multimedia, River North 1 Comment »
The letter "A" from Geoff Kaplan's "Incest" series

The letter "A" from Geoff Kaplan's "Incest" series, digital print

By Jason Foumberg

What is design but the decoration of meaning?—such that ‘good’ design is a fitting elaboration of subject matter. Words (perhaps these printed here) can be dressed to impress—Times New Roman—or be cloaked in perfect blankness—Helvetica, no doubt. But what if a serif were stretched beyond a flourish, and an italics jutted off the page, and punctuation spun on an axis too blindingly fast for the eye catch? Such formal fatuousness surely disservices the eager reader of words.

This problem, posed from the designer’s perspective, is treated in the exhibition “Dimension and Typography: A Survey of Letterforms in Space and Time,” co-curated by Jimmy Luu, a graphic design teacher at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Ryan Molloy, on the faculty at Eastern Michigan University. Luu and Molloy have assembled the typographic work of fifteen graphic designers in video, print, sculptural and computerized displays. Much of the work on view is highly experimental; they are the idea sketchbooks and conceptual counterpoints to real-world applications of graphic design.

The show’s theme takes its cue from J. Abbott Miller’s 1996 book “Dimensional Typography,” a celebrated study on how the common letter form has expanded off the flat page—in volume, space and time. Miller traces formalist approaches from Baroque-era floridity to the Bauhaus’ glorification of the machine in an age when the camera heightened the design world’s sense of light and shadow. The emergence of computational models at the end of the twentieth-century caps Miller’s thesis of typographic evolution. The new code-driven typography, largely initiated at the Massachusetts Institute of Design, fuses processing language with design vocabulary. Alphanumerics have been generated from random markings drawn by a program, some of which are on view in the exhibition. But perhaps more exciting is that these new letters live on the Internet in a share-friendly format where users can tweak them at will.

The unique computer esthetic is so new, though, that it can often be difficult to apply in useful situations. Imaginatively rendered letters, such as those from Geoff Kaplan’s “Incest” series, envision the known alphabet in sleek, translucent Transformer-like shapes. They are abstracted beyond easy recognition, perhaps only knowable when the digital prints are presented in a chart from A to Z.

spaceballgonzales_crisp_prototypeLike many pieces in the show, one sees the shape and structure of the letter before one can recognize its significance. It’s a bit like the gestalt process of language acquisition, where a child first encounters the world sensorily, grasping shiny shapes and color patches, and only later understands their names and rules. Kaplan’s digital renderings are abstract enough to potentially prompt momentary defamiliarization. At first the letters appear complex and strange, but they don’t mean more than what they say. A means A; it’s just a question of how A means A.

“Design lives in the world differently than fine art,” says co-curator Luu, such that good design doesn’t sit atop a pedestal waiting to be contemplated, but is instead immediately understood. We are users—not viewers—of signs, advertisements and books. That the exhibition does present typography in sculpted and abstract forms, much like fine art, and in a white cube art gallery, encourages a thoughtful approach far from the snap judgments provoked by some disposable consumer media.

daevel_detroit_alphabetYou’ll rarely find a designer’s signature in the corner of his or her work. Vernacular design may be expressive, but only expressive of its brand identity, not its maker. Increasingly, museums are beginning to collect and display the innovations and turning points in the design industry, from chairs to wallpaper to exhibition catalogues, and celebrity designers are emerging, identifiable by their style—itself a signature. The exhibition “Dimension and Typography,” which proudly announces the designers’ names, seeks to motivate the designer’s creative agency—but in a vacuum, without the input of a client. It’s hoped, though, that practical needs will catch up with innovation.

Luu is both an academic and a working designer, so he balances the theoretical and practical worlds of design. “Working with words,” he reflects, “the hard thing is that they have to say something.” How far can a designer push formal choices before alienating the subject matter—and become an artist? Luu is hopeful, though, that if the medium is the message, then perhaps it can contain its share of poetry and elegance.

After winning a public art commission in Austin, Texas, Luu installed the word “onward” in the turf outside the Health and Human Services Building using metal edging and planting the 30-foot letters with a different seed. As viewers interact with the landscape, they cannot read the word in total, but are able to witness the letters’ growth and fluctuations throughout the seasons. If message and form, object and idea, could always dynamically conflate in this way, we’d be well-versed in artful design.

Through February 7 at I space, 230 W. Superior.

Review: CarianaCarianne/I Space

Multimedia, River North No Comments »

RECOMMENDED

CarianaCarianne’s artistic project revolves around the task of gaining institutional acknowledgment for the two personalities existing in their singular, “collaborative” body.  To this end, CarianaCarianne’s new exhibition at I Space includes notarized Last Will and Testament documents for both Cariana and Carianne, a request for a revised birth certificate to reflect the birth’s plurality, and drawings, video and sculpture that describe technologies to achieve, for example, the “merged image field” that allows Cariana and Carianne to observe and record themselves. Much has been made of the fact that CarianaCarianne are not mentally ill and do not experience themselves as having dissociative identity disorder or multiple personalities. And yet, their art has been confined by this unusual biography, trapped by a narrative of difference that informs and propels their process but also limits its range and effects. The visual elegance of the schematic drawings and the obvious challenge that CarianaCarianne pose to normative modes of perception and being are both effective in the gallery space. After a decade of this kind of work, however, one waits to see its expansion beyond legal contracts and recognition to encompass broader aesthetic questions about seeing and knowing. (Rachel Furnari)

CarianaCarianne shows at I Space, 230 W. Superior, (312)587-9976, through December 20.

Review: Pulse of a Perfect Heart/I Space

Multimedia, River North, Student Shows No Comments »

RECOMMENDED

“Pulse of a Perfect Heart,” multimedia. The overwhelming dominance of East Asian artists over the contemporary photography scene is made starkly obvious in the University of Illinois visual-arts program’s annual MFA show, where Korean photo-artists Sung Yeoul Lee and Jung Kyong Kim take the laurels with their grim yet playful takes on the human body. Kim’s two black-and-white vertical series, hung side by side, of small shots of hands getting entangled in bracelets and metal bandages, respectively, place the accent on fun with an underlying and undercutting message of confinement. The stresses are reversed for Lee, who shows us a torso in which a man’s bald head, seen from behind, is firmly attached to a curvaceous feminine trunk seen frontally and clothed in a sheer beige turtleneck to which suction cups, from which cut off cords and nozzles dangle, have been affixed. An x-ray-like video next to Lee’s color photographs shows us the cups blazing with infernal white light as they do their work on the ambiguous subject’s innards. (Michael Weinstein)

At I Space, 230 W. Superior, (312)587-9976, through August 16.

Review: Strange Habit/I space

Multimedia, River North, Student Shows No Comments »

“Strange Habit” gets its name from a conversation that curator Luke Batten had with a physicist friend about the nature of experimentation. Seeking to chart the territory of “unexpected outcomes” between points A and B, the show catalogues work by five artists: Shane Huffman, Steven Husby, Emily Kennerk, Curtis Mann and Alice Shaw. Husby’s controlled geometric paintings exhibit his usual care and adequate image-making. Two large works of interlocking triangles filled with ascending and descending tones of blue show their object-ness with brushstrokes and large wooden panels, yet the shades of royal blue also allude to the fiction of atmospheric perspective in landscape painting. Around the corner hang Kennerk’s series “Portrait” in which studio portraiture sets are recorded empty. The props and backdrops are enticingly campy like leftover sets from 1970s cheesecake photos where one well-worn white fur bedspread sits below sunlit slivers from a window shade. The photos ooze a stale sexiness that breeds an awareness of slipping time. Huffman’s experiment covered too much territory to be legible, and Mann’s photos suffered from the opposite problem, an overuse of the same technique. Shaw’s gelatin prints, from the series “Opposite,” shows the artist alternating clothes and homes with a black drag queen. The portraits end up being incredibly tender, making the two seem more like twins rather than opposites. (Dan Gunn) 

Through May 31 at I space, 230 W. Superior, (312)587-997.

Review: We Construct the Chorus/I Space

Installation, River North, Sculpture, Video No Comments »

RECOMMENDED

The show takes its title from Barbara Kruger’s “We Construct the Chorus of Missing Persons” and gives voice to political art that is nuanced and sophisticated. In 2003, Emily Jacir did a piece in which she asked Palestinians, “If I could do anything for you, anywhere in Palestine, what would it be?” Palestinians living under a regime of severe travel restrictions and border controls could ask Jacir, with her U.S. passport, to run the errands and do the things that were denied them. She visited relatives and brought them proxy greetings and embraces; she watered a tree; she bought anise-flavored liquor for someone unable to buy it himself (because he lived in Gaza, where arak is unavailable.) In the current show, “From Texas With Love,” from 2002, she takes up this theme of restricted movement, asking fifty-one Palestinians what songs they would listen to if they could get in a car and drive for an hour—with no roadblocks and no border controls. The video shows a stretch of Texas highway (near where “Red River” was filmed), and you can select from among the songs chosen by the respondents: Amr Diab? Check. Sawt il Atlas? Check. Jacir’s work is juxtaposed with Luz Maria Sanchez’s “2,487,” commemorating those who died in the Mexico-US border crossing between 1993 and 2006. While these works are polemical, the sculptural pieces of Alice Koenitz and Katrina Moorhead are oblique, quiet, full of irony and indeterminacy and not a little humor. Finally, Brazilians Rivane Neuenschwander and Cao Guimaerães have made one of the most remarkable short films I have ever seen, of the intense labor of some ants to carry off confetti left over from the day after Carnival. The amplified sounds of the ants’ tiny movements imperceptibly changes to a tiny samba, created with the aid of matchsticks. And while I was watching these ants I could not help but think of another Barbara Kruger piece: “We won’t play nature to your culture.” (David Mark Wise)

Through March 22 at I Space, 230 W. Superior.