Installation view of “Chicago and Vicinity” at Shane Campbell Gallery, Spring 2016. /Photo: Evan Jenkins
In 1897, the Art Institute of Chicago began hosting an annual juried “Chicago and Vicinity” exhibition. As the 1985 catalog explained: “Though the format has changed, the purpose has remained essentially the same: to provide a forum for the best new art being produced in the Chicago area—1600 entries, 136 works, thirteen prizes.” But that turned out to be the last iteration. Big money was flowing into the contemporary art market and museums were not going to attract these investments with a quality-focused, locally specific curatorial practice begun in the nineteenth century.
Shane Campbell Gallery promotes its current version as a “snapshot of what is happening in studios across Chicago, filtered through the perspective of the gallery.” One might note this perspective is rather narrow. It seems that fully half the fifty chosen artists got a degree from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago after 1995, and most seem preoccupied by whatever may or may not distinguish art from non-art, profundity from banality, high culture from popular culture. Other personal, social or aesthetic issues are peripheral. Chicago’s distinguished master of these borderlands, Michelle Grabner, is not shown, but the influence of her investigations make her more present in this show than the fifteen other older Chicago artists who are included.
Installation view of “Chicago and Vicinity” at Shane Campbell Gallery, Spring 2016/Photo: Evan Jenkins
Among the SAIC graduates, William J. O’Brien is exceptional. His abstract-expressionist painting and life-size, ceramic torso are too full of gut-level strength to allow much speculation about the ontology of art. Matthew Metzger also stands out among the graduates of other schools. His reductive pictorial approach to presence and balance feels much fresher than the descendants of Duchamp’s “Fountain” or Malevich’s “Black Square” that hang nearby. There are also many fine works by legendary Chicago artists including a sharply designed print by Barbara Kasten, a master of abstract photography.
With so much borderline banality and pieces displayed in the offices as well as the main gallery, it was fun to guess which office furnishings were actually artworks. But the real excitement was the spanking new, museum-sized Shane Campbell Gallery itself. It is a substantial gift to the world of Chicago art, or, at least, one part of it. (Chris Miller)
Through April 23 at Shane Campbell Gallery, 2021 South Wabash.
Related Stories
Fake It When You Make It: A Review of “This Is A Pipe” at Shane Campbell Gallery In the era of Fake News, is it any longer critical for art to imitate life while neglecting its beauty?
Here Comes the Bogeyman: A Review of Tony Lewis at Shane Campbell Gallery Lewis returns with large-scale drawings and haunting sculptures made from remnants of a previous show.
Transcendent Humor: A Review of David Leggett at Shane Campbell Gallery Leggett reveals antidotes of society to us through black icons.
Painting the Erotic Plunders of Abstraction: A Review of Peter Fagundo at Shane Campbell Gallery Fagundo’s colorful image cycles consider the impulses built into perception, as well as the myriad possibilities of visual syntax.
Defining Chicago Imagism: A Review of What Came After: Figurative Painting in Chicago 1978-1998 at the Elmhurst Art Museum What could a transgressive art practice accomplish once it had become the new normal? A new Elmhurst Art Museum exhibition looks at figurative painting post-Hairy Who.
Beautiful, Yet Eminently Boring: A Review of “John Singer Sargent and Chicago’s Gilded Age” at the Art Institute of Chicago Sargent was a prodigiously gifted artist working in a transitional era in European art history.
